USC Center on Public Diplomacy

Direct link to this article: http://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/index.php/newsroom/specialreports_detail/4687/

Published: OCT 8, 2008 - 10:26AM PDT

Special Reports
Special reports are articles collecting the most relevant public diplomacy articles and information on topical issues, and are posted periodically by our research team at the USC Center on Public Diplomacy.

PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND THE BEIJING OLYMPICS: NARRATIVES AND COUNTER NARRATIVES
OCT 8, 2008 - 10:26AM PDT
by Meg Young

The overall narrative for these Olympics seems somewhat ambivalent: “they were a rousing success, but...” But they could only take place in a totalitarian country where the government can direct resources at will towards any national project. But the protest zones were left empty and some of those wanting to protest were arrested after they filed their paperwork. But…But…But… These codas marring an otherwise perfect Olympic performance may trouble a few perfection-seeking souls in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) but the overall public diplomacy impact of China’s Olympics seems to have been positive. International audiences did not learn much more beyond what they already knew about issues most sensitive to the CCP, particularly the Tibet situation: namely, that it is bad, and that China should “Free Tibet,” but quite why or how remained unclear through most of the international press’ reporting. However, these same audiences learned a lot more about the rest of China from a variety of trusted and familiar sources: local news anchors, bloggers, newspaper writers, and national news reporters. They saw snippets on unusual Chinese food and heard about amazing cultural sites. They were bombarded with images of a clean and modern Beijing, and they saw a world-class event pulled off without a hitch. This CPD Media Monitor followed the media coverage surrounding the 2008 Summer Olympic Games in Beijing, China from April to September 2008. The Monitor sought to highlight the narrative differences between the English-language Chinese press, particularly the government run news outlet Xinhua, and the international English-language press. By providing a comparison between the official Chinese Olympic narrative and the international media’s Olympic narrative, the Beijing Olympics Media Monitor provided a look at China’s effort at public diplomacy through the Olympics. Sometimes the local coverage and the international coverage converged, as it frequently did on stories about the spectacle of the Olympics and the rich culture of China, and at times the coverage diverged, particularly on issues related to human rights and media openness. The Beijing Olympics Media Monitor focused on five main areas of interest: Human Rights Local News Coverage / International News Coverage; Environmental Issues Local News Coverage / International News Coverage; Culture Local News Coverage / International News Coverage; Chinese Power Local News Coverage / International News Coverage; Media Local News Coverage / International News Coverage. Each of these subjects saw narratives emerge in the international press that were both favorable to and highly critical of China. The official Chinese press, on the other hand, always sought to put the best spin possible on any given issue. Through the course of the coverage it seemed clear that the strict narrative of the Chinese government would not be the story told by the international press regardless of how much the government tried to control press access to locations, the internet, or even at times their equipment. Whether or not the Chinese government’s narrative was the one the world heard seems, ultimately, to have mattered very little because at the end of the…... FULL TEXT

".$cat_name."

"; $news_query= "select entry_id, field_id_38, field_id_40, field_id_97 from cpd_weblog_data where entry_id in (select entry_id from cpd_category_posts where cat_id = $category)"; $news= mysql_query($news_query); while($row_news = mysql_fetch_array($news)) { $whatsnew_entry= $row_news["entry_id"]; $whatsnew_news = $row_news["field_id_38"]; $whatsnew_link = $row_news["field_id_40"]; $whatsnew_source = $row_news["field_id_97"]; $news_title_query= "select title, year, month, day from cpd_weblog_titles where entry_id = $whatsnew_entry"; $title= mysql_query($news_title_query); if ($news_title = mysql_fetch_array($title)) { $whatsnew_title= $news_title["title"]; $whatsnew_date= mktime(0,0,0,$news_title["month"],$news_title["day"],$news_title["year"]); } echo "".$whatsnew_title."
(".$whatsnew_source.", ".date("j M Y", $whatsnew_date).")
". $whatsnew_news."

"; } } ?>