The CPD Blog is intended to stimulate dialog among scholars, researchers, practitioners and professionals from around the world in the public diplomacy sphere. The opinions represented here are the authors' own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the USC Center on Public Diplomacy.
After meeting today with Navdeep Suri, Joint Secretary & Head of the Public Diplomacy Division in India, we learned that in the context of the Arab Spring, India is promoting Islam as an important aspect of Indian history and culture. One way to look at how well this is being done in India is to look at the way Indian mass media portrays Islam. It appears that Islam is often under- and mis-represented in the Indian media in both the Hindi and Urdu languages. This is important for public diplomacy because what India projects to the rest of the world has to accurately reflect what is happening internally to gain credibility. Because of the disconnect between a democracy that supports all people and a media that doesn't reflect this, India should reexamine the way that people in-country see themselves and their own identities before projecting an image abroad.
The Indian sub-continent is known for its ethnic, cultural, and linguistic diversity. With this diversity comes the conflict of competing ideologies, and the debate plays out in the mass media.
Islam is the second-most practiced religion in India after Hinduism, with over 13% practicing Muslims—or more than 138 million people. However, oftentimes the mainstream Indian media misrepresents and underrepresents the Muslim Indian population and does not always accurately reflect the reality of the millions of Muslims in India. A combination of factors influence the way that Islam is portrayed in Indian mass media, which include:
Political party affiliation to news sources
Western media infiltration
Lack of a coherent self-view among Indian Muslims
Hindi is the most commonly spoken language in India, and Hindi newspapers therefore have a multi-million readership
in the country. These papers are run by elites and higher castes that have the education and ability to pursue a career in journalism. It is important to remember that these papers are a business and ‘saleability’ means a lot, especially in terms of dealing with minorities. Therefore, looking for the extreme voices and areas of conflict brings in more profit rather than, say, a Hindu and a Muslim sitting down and having a reasoned debate. Hindi-language media concentrates on the sensational aspects of Islam, having a tendency to extend these generalizations to the Indian Muslim population as a whole.
Most Muslim representations in Indian media are limited to the Urdu-language media. This fact comes with a lot of challenges and pitfalls to portraying a more moderate view of Islam within India. First of all, Urdu is considered to be a language of the madrasah-educated north Indian poor, so it is difficult for newspapers to sell ad space to generate revenue. Without the necessary revenue, the quality and professionalism of these papers decreases. Many of these papers therefore have poor working conditions, low salaries, and outdated equipment. These monetary conditions are not conducive to good, solid journalism.
There seems to be a huge potential for an Urdu-language media group to come in and rectify the situation currently facing the Urdu press. There is a vacuum for solid, professional Urdu journalism, and someone with the monetary means could help the Urdu press change their view of self to help promote positive and objective overall news coverage of Islam in India. By changing the narrative of self, the portrayal to the rest of the country can be improved.
While both Hindi and Urdu newspapers deal with the topic of Islam and Muslims differently, there are some similarities in the way that Muslims are portrayed. Ironically, neither Urdu nor Hindi give much attention to positive achievements of the Muslim community. Because of the business nature of the industry, sensational stories and negative events are given more time and space. This makes for more ‘marketable’ news that ignores many problems that Muslims face within India, including educational problems, economic stratification, and social injustices.
Often, there is a lack of a ‘moderate’ or average Muslim voice being heard in either Hindi or Urdu news. The main spokespeople for Islam and Muslims that are most easily accessible tend to be the authoritative, conservative community leaders, or ulemas-- thus offering only one view of a situation. In order for the portrayal of Indian Muslims to change, more voices need to be heard. The views of the ulemas do not speak for an entire community, much as the views of congress do not speak for the entire U.S. population. These usual suspects tend to use Islam as self-promotion and publicity and do not have the interests of the Indian Muslim masses in mind.
Should the journalists be responsible for seeking out alternate views, or should more Indian Muslims seek out media to share their views? The answer seems unclear, and I argue that a combination of better journalism and an active interest in self-portrayal from Indian Muslims will be the optimal output to change Indian media’s portrayal of Muslims—both Hindi and Urdu speaking. Anna Dawson is a Master of Public Diplomacy candidate and a Senior Editor for USC’s Public Diplomacy Magazine. She is also participating in the India:Inside Out Project. This past summer, she interned at the Center for International Private Enterprise in Washington, DC.
Madhur on December 24, 2011 @ 1:59 am I am not too comfortable about the creation of a narrative representing Muslim identity in Indian media. Simply because it reinforces religion in the discourse.
The reality of India is a 'composite culture' best represented in a language like 'Urdu' or Hindustani. The history of Urdu language will tell you that it is not a 'Muslim tongue' but rather a language that represents best the unity and diversity of India. 'Arabic' is the language of the madrasahs.
Indian media took on the high and mighty really well during the Gujarat riots in defence of the minorities.
I dont know of any 'Ulema voice' in Indian media apart from the Shahi Imam who is representative of the Ummah in India.
Market economics will not support a Urdu press. Besides, Urdu is not a 'mother tongue' unlike other regional languages in India, so there is simply no market. The reason for this again is the historical development of Urdu language.
Lack of a 'coherent self-view among Indian Muslims' is a strong statement to make. It resembles the narrative of the colonial British who thrived on divide and rule. I don't think many Indian Muslims will agree with it. Hindus and Muslims have lived together in this country for more than 1000 years. India has the second largest Muslim population in the world and the entire Muslim population is bigger than the whole of Middle East. The biggest and most loved stars of Bollywood are Muslims, the last President was Muslim, one of our most successful cricket captain was a Muslim, some of India's greatest academics are Muslims, father of India's missile program was a Muslim, India's greatest poet ever was a Muslim, Ghazals remain popular among Indians and Sufi music is one of the most popular genres among young Indians.
However, this is not to say that there are some problems peculiar to Muslim community. The reason for that is primarily historical and political development of Muslims in India and not solely because of their religious affiliation. Casteism is also prevalent among Indian Muslims. Islam practiced in Kashmir is different from Islam practiced in North East and each gives rise to unique problems that are regional.
Nonetheless I do agree its an endless debate. However, I would caution against trying to create a new narrative focused on religious identity. It's an Indian identity. Any discussion on the community has to happen within the larger Indian identity - that of a composite culture. Otherwise, it will be going back to the cunning and brutalities of the British rule.