The CPD Blog is intended to stimulate dialog among scholars, researchers, practitioners and professionals from around the world in the public diplomacy sphere. The opinions represented here are the authors' own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the USC Center on Public Diplomacy at the Annenberg School.
The reaction in much of the world was muted, or less. But in some countries that have racial tensions similar to the U.S., the coverage was less muted — and looked familiar.
In Canada, perhaps not unexpectedly, there were Sunday headlines familiar to U.S. readers: "Tsk tsk, Obama spoke too soon" in the National Post and "Black Harvard prof's arrest shakes U.S." deep inside the Toronto Star, the latter also featuring a Canadian case of racial profiling. But the big story in the Star Sunday was a dispatch from its Washington bureau on the latest public opinion polls, headlined "Are Americans souring on Barack Obama?" — a story flooded with reader comments.
In the U.K., coverage in the Guardian was played down. Deep inside, headlined "Black professor in race row arrest accepts Obama's invitation for a beer," was a story that could have been straight from U.S. wire services. And check out the numerous reader comments at the bottom of this Times of London story, which easily could have been in the Boston Globe.
The London Telegraph featured a provocative headline "Barack Obama takes sides against the police," in an opinion piece that included a stereotype Americans would recognize from the syntax even if they don't know the British TV show: "There is touch of the Ali Gs here — 'is it coz I is black?'"
But it turns out Telegraph readers were far more fascinated over the weekend by a very different story about President Obama: the most widely viewed story on the newspaper's web site today (Sunday) was the controversy over Obama's birth certificate.
Turning to the Middle East, Al Jazeera featured a story, with video, headlined "Obama condemns arrest of black professor." It featured a sub-headline, "Barack Obama may have broken racial boundaries when he became the first black US president, but he has admitted that racism is common." That qualifies as today's dog-bites-man story: if the President had said the reverse, that racism is extremely rare, that would be a story.
Interestingly, in Africa this was not big news. Yes, the Independent on Line had a report, buried far down in its web site, headlined "Obama blasts police 'stupidity'" . But most African media, from Ghana to Kenya, Cairo to Cape Town, ignored it or downplayed it. Far more prominent was continuing coverage of Michael Jackson, such as a feature story in South Africa's City Press.
Without question the extreme headline of the week was from the North Korean news agency DPRK: "Progressive scholar Henry Louis Gates, Jr. released from U.S. torture prison after outcry of world democratic peoples."
That was just below "U.S. plagued by doubt as to whether so-called president Obama was born an Indonesian slave," which shows the North Koreans have some of the same interests as readers of the London Telegraph.
As is so often the case, however, the North Korean news agency story was just too good to be true. It turns out that probably was not the North Korean news agency after all: Forbes and others have found it may all be an Internet hoax.
Titus on July 28, 2009 @ 9:49 am I figure these papers/populaces see race through their own lens, which has little to do with how Americans see or experience race. Take Al Jazeera: underscoring race plays to the "man keepin' us down" tone of coverage from other Middle Eastern media. While that may not be 'news' since it's a dog-bites-man story, it is something that me and the fellas at the tea shop (or the barbershop) can all nod in agreement to.
Jake on February 10, 2010 @ 10:32 am Obama needs to walk a fine line with any issue that might even be the slightest bit racially charged. The gray area in this situation lies in the fact that the police most likely would have acted (not reacted) in the same manner whether or not the professor had colored skin. After all, the trespassers were inside the house, and the professor was not. It is a common assumption (even without regards to race) that the people inside are the home-owners, and would get to speak with the authorities first.
I believe that the professor should have recognized this and conducted himself in a more reasonable manner, rather than immediately reacting in a negative way. It's like the say, "it's not what you say, but how you say it."
