Abstract
This chapter explores existing practices regarding the Hellenic Embassies’ use of Twitter, paving the way toward their optimization. Twitter diplomacy offers significant advantages yet use in the Greek public sector appears to be sparse and anemic, depriving opportunities that would benefit the country. The authors studied a sample of five Twitter accounts in five different countries for 7 days, conducting quantitative and thematic analysis. Thus, they collected evidence on the frequency and periodical nature of the tweets; on the interactivity between the users and the account owners; on the existence of content strategy and content pillars; on the selected language; and, finally, on the extroversion of these accounts and the overall assessment of the communication strategy followed. The Greek Communication Officers appear to be using Twitter hesitantly, responding to occurrences rather than building opportunities, divided between the imperative for a tightly controlled central communication policy and the need for agile, real time, localized, interactive approaches with specific target groups in each country. Significant variations emerge from one Twitter account to another, thus indicating a lack of diffusion in terms of know-how and a lack of adequate alignment between the Greek central administration and the Communication Officers in Greek embassies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avery EJ, Wooten GM (2013) Political public relations and the promotion of participatory, transparent government through social media. Int J Strateg Commun 7:274–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2013.824885
Natarajan K (2014) Digital diplomacy and a strategic narrative for India. Strateg Anal 38(1):91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2014.863478
The laws are available at: https://www.mfa.gr/to-ypourgeio/domi/apostoli-kai-armodiotites.html; https://www.e-nomothesia.gr/diplomatiki-nomothesia-dietheis-organismoi/n-3566-2007.html; https://www.e-nomothesia.gr/kat-ekpaideuse/nomos-4505-2017-fek-189a-8-12-2017.html
Nye J (2005) Soft power: the means to success in world politics, New Ed edn. Public Affairs, New York
Dasgupta A (2011) Making public diplomacy work. J Int Commun 17(1):73–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2011.556087
Wang J (2006) Managing national reputation and international relations in the global era: public diplomacy revisited. Public Relat Rev 32(2):91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.12.001
Holmstrom M (2015) The narrative and social media. Defense Strat Commun J 1(1):119–133. https://www.stratcomcoe.org/miranda-holmstrom-narrative-and-social-media. Accessed Apr 2019
Sharp P (2005) Revolutionary states, outlaw regimes and the techniques of public diplomacy. In: Melissen J (ed) The new public diplomacy: soft power in international relations. Palgrave, Hampshire, pp 3–14
Kim H (2017) Bridging the theoretical gap between public diplomacy and cultural diplomacy. Korean J Int Stud 15(2):293–326. https://doi.org/10.14731/kjis.2017.08.15.2.293
Melissen J (2005) The new public diplomacy: between theory and practice. In: Melissen J (ed) The new public diplomacy: soft power in international relations. Palgrave, Hampshire, pp 3–14
Izadi F (2016) US public diplomacy: a theoretical treatise. J Arts Manag Law Soc 46(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2015.1137093
Pamment J (2012) New public diplomacy in the 21st century: a comparative study of policy and practice. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203096734
Kavanaugh AL, Fox EA, Sheetz SD, Yang S, Tzy Li L, Shoemaker DJ, Natsev A, Xie L (2012) Social media use by government: from the routine to the critical. Gov Inf Q 29:480–499. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037574
Cull NJ (2011) WikiLeaks, public diplomacy 2.0 and the state of digital public diplomacy. Place Brand Public Dipl 7(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2011.2
Zhong X, Lu J (2013) Public diplomacy meets social media: a study of the U.S. Embassy’s blogs and micro-blogs. Public Relat Rev 39(5):542–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.002
Park SJ, Lim YS (2014) Information networks and social media use in public diplomacy: a comparative analysis of South Korea and Japan. Asian J Commun 24(1):79–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2013.851724
Waters RD, Williams JM (2011) Squawking, tweeting, cooing, and hooting: analyzing the communication patterns of government agencies on Twitter. J Public Aff 11(4):353–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.385
Jukić T, Merlak M (2017) The use of social networking sites in public administration: the case of Slovenia. e-Government 15(1):2–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2018-0019. www.ejeg.com
Small TA (2013) E-government in the age of social media: an analysis of the Canadian Government’s use of Twitter. Policy Internet 4(3–4):91–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.12
Heine J, Turcotte JF (2012) Tweeting as statecraft: how, against all odds, Twitter is changing the World’s second oldest profession. Crossroads III(2):57–72
Dodd MD, Collins SJ (2017) Public relations message strategies and public diplomacy 2.0: an empirical analysis using central-eastern European and Western embassy Twitter accounts. Public Relat Rev 43(2):417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.004
Storie LK (2015) Lost publics in public diplomacy: antecedents for online relationship management. Public Relat Rev 41(2):315–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.02.008
Riffe D, lacy S, Fico F, Watson B (2019) Analyzing media messages using quantitative content analysis in research. Routledge, New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429464287
Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T (2013) Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci 15:398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Joffe H, Yardley L (2004) Content and thematic analysis. In: Marks DF, Yardley L (eds) Research methods for clinical and health psychology. Sage, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Miliopoulou, GZ., Papaioannou, E. (2020). Greek Embassies on Twitter and the Quest for a Strategy. In: Kavoura, A., Kefallonitis, E., Theodoridis, P. (eds) Strategic Innovative Marketing and Tourism. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36126-6_109
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36126-6_109
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36125-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36126-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)